Showing posts with label robert manzanares. Show all posts
Showing posts with label robert manzanares. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Utah Adoption Council President Resigns...

SALT LAKE CITY
By: Lori Prichard
— The president of the Utah Adoption Council resigned Tuesday amid controversy over claims the council is working to undermine the rights of birth fathers. Wes Hutchins was to serve another month as president of the Ut ah Adoption Council (UAC) — a group consisting of adoption agencies, adoption attorneys, families, and birth mothers and fathers. Instead, he's founded a new nonprofit organization he says will work in the best interests of all parties in adoptions. There was certainly friction in Tuesday's council meeting, as some representing adoption agencies accused Hutchins of having his own agenda. In turn, he pointed fingers at them for not acting ethically in administering adoptions. "I'm a big proponent of adoptions, but I firmly believe they need to be done legally, constitutionally and ethically." –Wes Hutchins, former UAC president "I'm an adoption attorney. I've done over 1,080 adoptions, (and) finalized six adoptions on Friday of last week alone," Hutchins said, following the meeting. "I'm a big proponent of adoptions, but I firmly believe they need to be done legally, constitutionally and ethically." Hutchins pointed to what he calls "egregious cases of fraud," namely: the case of Christopher Carlton, who was told by the birth mother that his child had died, and the case of Robert Manzanares, who was told by the birth mother she was traveling from Colorado to Utah to visit relatives when she was actually giving up their child. These cases, and many like them, provide evidence, Hutchins said, that birth mothers should be held accountable. "That's one of the changes that we need to make: that fraud is no longer accepted as a method of taking a child from one home, destroying a family, and placing (the child) in another home to create another family," he said. That opinion conflicts with others who sit on the UAC. "Wes has had a different vision of what's best for children in the state of Utah," said attorney David Hardy, also a former president of the UAC. Hardy, whose clients include adoption agencies and adoptive parents, said Hutchins isn't as focused on what's best for the child. "Wes has taken more of the approach of some of the rights of fathers. He's taken some real strong positions on fathers that are, in many ways, inconsistent with Utah code." –David Hardy, former UAC president "Wes has taken more of the approach of some of the rights of fathers," Hardy said. "He's taken some real strong positions on fathers that are, in many ways, inconsistent with Utah code." "There's been a very choreographed effort to sweep birth fathers and others under the rug," Hutchins said. And some of those birth fathers were present and vocal. "I do have a voice, and it needs to be heard," said Jake Strickland, a father currently fighting for custody of his child. "There's two sides to every story," added Bobby Nevares, a man in the same situation as Strickland, "but they didn't want to hear the father's side." Hutchins said the council didn't really want to hear his side either and accused him of having an agenda. "If you want to call that ‘an agenda,' then absolutely, call it an agenda. And that agenda is to see that we have a balanced approach in Utah to how we're doing adoptions," Hutchins said. It's clear this father's right is a hot-button issue among the council. Today's meeting was certainly tense as each side traded accusations.

Friday, April 20, 2012

The wheels are turning...

Congratulations to John Wyatt, in his Virgina Supreme Court ruling, to pursue damages against A Act of Love, Larry Jenkins, Laraine Moon, and the adoptive (stolen) parents of Baby Emma.

Every father fighting and winning is just one step forward for Baby Jack. This is great news and we can't wait to hear what happens with Robert Manzanares this upcoming week in his custody battle.

Things keep happening for the good, and they won't stop until justice is served for all father's out there. This wouldn't be possible without all of the media attention, social media, and the viewers and readers like you that keep spreading the word about the atrocity that is occuring in Utah with adoption.

Keep spreading the word about Baby Jack and all the other birthfathers and together we can make a difference.

We are still waiting for a court date. We have submitted a few new motions that need to have a response in the next week, which will probably be followed by an extension, but it's a GREAT step in our case. We can't wait to share.

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Birth Father's Unite

Bobby Navares. Jake Strickland. Robert Manzanares

One step closer for Rob!





Full Story
Colorado father’s custody fight moves back to his home state

Adoption • It’s the next step in precedent-setting case.


image
Paul Fraughton | The Salt Lake Tribune Rob Manzanares and his mother, Elizabeth, stand next to their attorney Jennifer Reyes, right, after a Wednesday hearing on the custody of Rob Manzanares' daughter, given up at birth without his consent.

A birth father’s four-year battle for custody of his daughter will now move to a Colorado court after a Utah judge agreed Wednesday to dismiss the child’s adoption.

Third District Judge Paul Maughan said he wants to review the landmark Utah Supreme Court ruling that sent Colorado resident Rob Manzanares’ case back to the lower court but, barring any obstacles, will sign an order dismissing the adoption, which had not been finalized. That will allow a Colorado court to fully take over the dispute. Maughan also ordered that Manzanares’ name be added to his daughter’s birth certificate.

Manzanares, who has fought for his right to parent his daughter since before her birth in 2008, broke down in tears outside the courtroom at the prospect of soon being reunited with her.

“It’s just a step closer to getting to see my girl I’ve been fighting for for so long and I just can’t wait to hold her and bring her home where she belongs, with her family,” said Manzanares of his daughter, who will remain with her prospective adoptive parents for now.

While the Colorado judge has agreed to put the case on a fast track, Manzanares still has a legal fight ahead of him.

The child’s adoptive parents, relatives of the birth mother, have asked the Colorado judge to terminate Manzanares’ parental rights. Carie Terry, the birth mother, also has filed a conditional motion requesting that her parental rights be terminated in Colorado but only after Manzanares’ rights are terminated. Terry’s rights were already terminated in Utah as part of the adoption proceeding here.

Despite that, Manzanares is optimistic the end line is near.

“I believe Colorado will do what’s right and make a determination of the best interests of my daughter,” he said. “No other father should have to go through this and, more importantly, no child should have to go through this. I’ve been asked by many fathers for help and assistance. My biggest thing for them is just be very patient and don’t give up hope and keep fighting and do it in a peaceful manner.”

Attorney Larry Jenkins, who represents the prospective adoptive parents, and attorney David Harding, who represents the birth mother, declined comment after the hearing. The prospective adoptive father also declined comment.

But the tension between the parties was evident as they filed into the courtroom for the hearing when the prospective adoptive father attempted to push Manzanares on the shoulder — but ended up pushing Elizabeth Manzanares, his mother — and called him a “perjurer.”

“I don’t know why,” Manzanares said. “He’s a little upset with me. I have no hard feelings. I hope nothing but the best for them. I just want my daughter back and I’m willing to whatever I can and whatever I need to do to get her back into my arms.”

In a split decision, the Utah Supreme Court ruled in January that Manzanares was improperly denied a say in his daughter’s adoption, with the majority finding he could not have known Terry planned to give birth and place the baby for adoption in Utah due to numerous misleading and false statements she made about her intentions.

In fact, Terry stated in a court filing in a paternity action Manzanares filed in Colorado before the baby’s birth that she had no such plan. Terry gave birth in Utah on Feb. 17, 2008, and appeared in 3rd District Court three days later to relinquish her parental rights; she informed the Colorado court that same day she could not attend a hearing because she was still in Utah visiting a sick relative.

In a subsequent hearing, a Utah judge found Terry had deliberately deceived him and concealed relevant information from judges in Utah and Colorado but allowed the adoption to proceed after ruling that Manzanares had not acted in time to protect his rights under Utah’s stringent statutory deadlines.

In its decision the Utah Supreme Court said it was returning the case to the lower court to determine whether Manzanares met Colorado requirements for establishing paternal rights and shown a full commitment to his parental responsibilities — questions the Colorado court will now decide.

The decision spotlighted problems birth fathers face in Utah and offers some direction for lower court judges, said Jennifer Reyes, Manzanares’ Utah attorney.

“I believe that birth fathers who are willing to step up to the plate and parent their children should be given an opportunity,” Reyes said after Wednesday’s hearing. “Before she was even born, he was saying to everyone, ‘Hello, I’m here, I want to have custody of my daughter, I want to take care of her, I want to love her.’”

Other biological fathers are carefully watching what happens in the case. Jake Strickland, who lives in South Jordan, and Bobby Nevares of Colorado, who also are contesting adoption of their biological children, gathered outside the courtroom Wednesday to support Manzanares.

“It’s not fair that he would have to come here and be by himself when there are so many other guys who are going through the same thing,” said Strickland, who has renewed his effort to intervene in the adoption of his son, born in 2010.

Added Nevares, whose son was also born in 2010 and placed for adoption in Utah: “It’s not just a one-man fight. Showing our support to him gives him the courage to keep going with it. It gives me a lot of hope to see that somebody is going to keep going as far as he has gone.”

brooke@sltrib.com


© 2012 The Salt Lake Tribune



http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=19678850

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Come show your support

Tomorrow at 9 AM, please find yourself at the Matheson Courthouse Rm N42 in Salt Lake, Utah, in support of Robert Manzanares. He has a court hearing to dismiss his case in Utah and allow it to move to the Colorado court system, where he has properly been fighting for his rights to parent his biological daughter. Rob's case has seen a first in the Utah Supreme Court where they have ruled against a lower Utah district court ruling and ruled in favor of the father. His case is HUGE for Baby Jack. There is a very, very great chance he will be getting custody of his precious daughter that he never wanted to be placed for adoption.

If you have a free moment, we would love the support.

Thank you!

Saturday, March 3, 2012

Father frustrated by Utah law closer to getting daughter back

Full Story

DENVER - Over the past four years, Rob Manzanares has made many visits to the courthouse.
"It's getting a little hard," he said Friday.
He's been to so many hearings, it is hard to keep track.
"Oh my goodness, I think is 12 or 13 times we've been to court over this matter," he said.
Manzanares is fighting to be a dad to his biological daughter. He says he is fighting what feels like a system of injustice.
What happens in Denver Courtroom 2F on Friday matters to fathers like him all over the country.
Carie Terry is the birth mother of their daughter. A Utah Supreme Court justice said Terry deceived the court and Manzanares by secretly planning to go to Utah and have their baby. She didn't tell him about the birth and then gave her up for adoption to her brother and sister-in-law without his consent. She did that knowing Manzanares has already filed for his parental rights before the child was born.
The Utah Supreme Court recently ruled in Manzanares's favor, sending the case back to Colorado. That is what prompted Friday's hearing.
"I am encouraged, but we are still not at the ultimate goal. That is for me to have custody of her, she is my daughter," he said.
For four years, his daughter has lived with one family in Utah. The attorney for the child's adoptive parents argues it is in her best interest to stay with them despite all legal issues before her birth and since.
Manzanares's lawyer, John Hedrick, calls it an illegal adoption. He says it cannot, by law, stand.
"Rob has never consented to this adoption. The adoptive parents aren't adoptive parents because Utah would still need his consent," Hedrick said.
Terry was at the hearing in Denver on Friday, but she did not want to talk publically about the case. Her lawyer has said, in a statement, that she made the best decisions at that time for her daughter. She is against any disruption of her living situation.
Wes Hutchins is the president of the Utah Adoption Council and a lawyer. He says Utah law stacks the deck against unmarried biological dad. He says there are birth mothers exploiting it.
"The idea that birth mothers can travel from any other state and be in Utah for two or three days and give birth to a child and then leave the state with the sole purpose of cutting off the rights of the birth father's has to stop," Hutchins said.
The hearing ended with another one set. The next could determine custody of the little girl. Manzanares is optimistic.
"Every step now is a court hearing closer to maybe the ultimate goal of having in my arms," he said.
(KUSA-TV © 2012 Multimedia Holdings Corporation)

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Court hearing over baby's adoption may mark change in fathers' rights in Utah

Robert Manzanares lives in New Mexico. For the past four years he has traveled to Utah waging a legal battle to get his daughter back.

Manzanares says he has taken a hit emotionally and financially with legal fees totaling more than $170,000. A recent Utah Supreme Court ruling is giving him a glimmer of hope.   

Get It Now: FOX 13 News E-mail Newsletters and Text Message Alerts | Mobile Web Site and Smartphone Apps | Twitter and Facebook


   
Manzanares has been a part of his son's life since the day he was born, but he's a stranger to his 4-year-old daughter Kaia. Manzanares says his ex-girlfriend placed Kaia with an adoptive family without his consent.

“About 3 months into the pregnancy, she determined she needed to end the relationship with me. And that's when the conversation of adoption occurred,” said Manzanares.

Manzanares says he was against giving his daughter up and told his ex-girlfriend, Carie Terry. that he would take responsibility of raising the girl his own.

“She tried to get the Family Services in Colorado involved to try to work with us and try to get me to meet with them. I kept telling them, no, no, no,” said Manzanares.

Manzanares, who isn't LDS, claims her Mormon bishop encouraged them to give up their parental rights and place the child with a Mormon family.

Although the couple broke up, Manzanares said he continued to pay for child support and offered to take her to doctor appointments.

“Obviously, she cut me off,” Mazanares says.

He says that began the legal process.

“I filed for paternity action in Colorado along with an injunction to adoption because I had this fear that she was going to adopt this child either way in the state of Colorado,” Manzanares said.

While the two were waiting for a scheduled court hearing, Terry told Manzanares she was going to Utah to visit her sick father. But adoption records in Utah lay out a different story. Terry had the baby prematurely in Utah and finalized the adoption, giving the baby to her brother and his wife, leaving Robert unaware.

“She had given her consent to the adoption the same day of the Colorado hearing. Actually, it was parallel meetings that happened within minutes of each other,” he said.

Robert then launched a legal battle, both in Utah and Colorado. His attorney warned him it wouldn't be easy and that Utah laws make it tough for unwed fathers.

“A law on its face may have a good objective, but here it's taken a turn for the worse and here they're providing a safe harbor for mothers to flee to Utah to give birth to their child and not have the dad to consent to an adoption,” said adoption attorney John Hedrick.

Manzanares filed for paternity in Utah, but a district judge upheld the adoption. The Utah Supreme Court took the case and on Jan. 27 of this year, they reversed that decision sending it back to district court. It was a ruling favoring a biological father, the first time in Utah’s history and what some call groundbreaking.

Carrie Terry declined an interview with FOX 13, but released a statement that says in part:

Vilification of the circumstances and the people involved will not help the child, who most benefits most from adoption. It is my hope that in future legal proceedings and in the attention given to this case, the focus will be on what is best for the child and her needs.

Utah's adoption law is supposed to balance the interests of the state, mother, biological father, infant and adoptive parents. The rights of biological fathers are an issue being taken up at the Capitol during the current legislative session.


Friday, January 27, 2012

Congratulations!


Salt Lake Tribune Article
Utah high court reverses ruling in adoption case of unwed Colorado dad
Justices’ decision also reinterprets sufficient notice from mothers.
image
Rob Manzanares, shown here with his son, is awaiting a Utah Supreme Court decision on his bid for custody of a daughter born to a former girlfriend and placed for adoption in Utah. Courtesy of Robert Manzanares
The Utah Supreme Court ruled Friday that a Colorado father was improperly denied a say in his infant daughter’s adoption and sent the case back to a lower court for a rehearing.
In a split decision that establishes a new ground rule for future cases, a majority of three justices held Robert Manzanares did not know and reasonably could not have known that a birth and adoption would take place in Utah, entitling him to intervene in the proceedings.
Although Manzanares stated in a paternity petition filed in Colorado months before the birth he feared his girlfriend might flee to Utah, those concerns were “yellow flags” and not the same thing as having knowledge of such a plan, wrote Justice Thomas Lee for the high court.
Manzanares reasonably relied on birth mother Carie Terry’s assurance, stated in Colorado court filings, that she had no intention of going to Utah to give birth and place their baby for adoption, Friday’s opinion noted. He was unaware the child had been born in Utah until several days after Terry consented to an adoption, the high court said.
The justices said they were “disavowing” a “potentially confusing” interpretation of what constitutes notice to an unwed father as set out in a 2009 ruling in the case of Wyoming father Cody O’Dea, when they deemed a text message stating “I’m in Utah” to be adequate.
There is a difference between a belief and actual knowledge, the high court said, and “it cannot be enough to simply establish that the father had ‘notice’ in the sense of suspicion sufficient to trigger a further inquiry.”
While Utah’s law does not permit an unwed father to use fraud by the birth mother as a defense for failure to protect his rights, the birth mother’s actions and statements are material in determining what he knew about her plans and when he knew it — and thus whether he was required to act before the birth mother gave consent.
The justices instructed the lower court to determine whether Manzanares met Colorado requirements for establishing parental rights to his daughter and whether he had shown a full commitment to his parental responsibilities.
Manzanares was nearly speechless after learning of the court’s decision.
“It is still an uphill battle but as I’ve said from day one, I won’t stop climbing that mountain until I have her in my life,” he said. “I’ve missed so much of her life. It is incredible to know that I could be with her soon.”
John Hedrick, Manzanares’ Colorado attorney, called the ruling a “step in the right direction. Unfortunately, it is still going to be a tedious process for Rob to achieve his ultimate goal.”
Hedrick also said the case should now move to Colorado, where Manzanares lives and where he timely filed to protect his parental rights.
Attorney Larry Jenkins, who represents the adoptive parents, did not respond Friday to a request for comment.
Manzanares and Terry, both Colorado residents, conceived a child in the summer of 2007. After their relationship ended, Manzanares made clear he opposed adoption and would, if necessary, raise the child on his own. Manzanares provided financial support throughout Terry’s pregnancy.
On Jan. 11, 2008, Terry sent Manzanares an email stating she planned to travel to Utah in February to visit her sick father and that she would be willing to sit down and talk to him about “your reconsideration to consent for adoption” in April, although the baby was due in late March.
Five days later, Manzanares filed a paternity action in Colorado, seeking to join any adoption proceeding and telling the court he feared Terry might go to Utah to give birth. In a subsequent court document filed in February, Terry denied she planned to pursue an adoption in Utah and asked the court to terminate Manzanares’ parental rights so an adoption could proceed in Colorado. She also asked the court to reschedule a hearing set for Feb. 20 because of her Utah trip. The Colorado court refused.
Terry arrived in Utah on Feb. 14, 2008. On Feb. 16, Terry’s brother and sister-in-law signed a petition to adopt the baby, who was born six weeks prematurely the next day. An adoption petition was filed in Utah state court days later.
Meanwhile, Terry informed the Colorado court on Feb. 20 she was still in Utah visiting a sick relative. Terry did not disclose that she had given birth or that she had appeared that morning in a Utah court and consented to the adoption.
Terry returned to Colorado on Feb. 24. A day later, Manzanares learned she had given birth and began calling Colorado hospitals in an attempt to locate his daughter. He also called Terry’s brother, who said only that an attorney would be calling him.
On March 3, after a three-day emergency hearing, a Colorado judge granted Manzanares’ paternity petition and ordered that his name be listed on his daughter’s birth certificate. Manzanares then filed a motion in Utah to dismiss the adoption petition.
A July hearing on that motion revealed Terry’s “multiple efforts to keep Manzanares in the dark” about her plans and her failure to inform judges in each state about what was happening in the different court hearings. Despite that, the judge found Manzanares had not properly acted to protect his rights in Utah and his consent was not required, leaving the adoption intact. Manzanares appealed.
Friday’s opinion says the lower court conflated “belief” with “knowledge.”
“The evidence in the record sustains only one conclusion — that Manzanares did not know and could not have known of a qualifying circumstance in light of Terry’s deception before she executed her consent to adoption,” the opinion said.
Chief Justice Christine Durham concurred in the majority opinion, adding that in her view although the majority and dissent arrived at different outcomes, both sought to “give full force to the legislature’s intent.”
But Justice Jill Parrish and Associate Chief Justice Matthew Durrant, who is poised to take the helm of the judiciary as chief justice, dissented. In an opinion authored by Parrish, they lambast the majority for “wholly undermining” legislative intent, providing a “tortured” analysis of the law that will disrupt future adoptions, and disregarding the findings of a lower court judge and previous Supreme Court opinions.
“Although the result reached by the majority is defensible on basic fairness grounds, it is entirely at odds with the provisions of the Utah Adoption Act and the policy decisions duly enacted by the Utah legislature,” wrote Parrish.
“The majority allows Mr. Manzanares to upset Baby B.’s adoptive placement even though he was indisputably aware that Ms. Terry was considering a Utah adoption but failed to comply with the relatively simple procedures required to perfect his rights,” the dissent argues.
brooke@sltrib.comTwitter: @Brooke4Trib

© 2012 The Salt Lake Tribune