Sunday, January 6, 2013

Dear Readers.


Dear readers,

This is Jackson’s grandma. I would like to personally thank each and every one of you for your support and love that you have continued to show us over the last two years.  We have had so many emotions, blessings and heartaches that we would not have been able to get through without the continued support of family and friends. 

I would like to write today in response to one comment recently posted on the blog under the post “Stealing from the married ones too” regarding an article in the Salt Lake Tribune written by Brooke Adams.  First I, we would like to say we do not normally respond to negative comments because everyone has the right to their own opinion and we have learned a great deal about all sides of adoption.  Emotions are high from each angle. We respect that.

Though this comment made a statement at the end which is totally untrue. Jake has not acted in any way “creepy” towards the birth mother or adoptive parents.  In fact Jake has from the beginning taken the high road, and tried to ensure that the names of the adoptive couple are not revealed.  He has not spoken with Whitney since the night that she told him that she had given Jackson up.  We have seen Whitney in court twice, while supporting Kyle(Whitney's ex husband) in a court hearing which involved two counts of child neglect that had been reported to DCFS.  But, none of our family spoke to Whitney. 

As far as reaching out to the adoptive couple, I placed two calls in April 2011, to the paternal grandparents requesting that the couple and Jake meet to share their sides of the story.  I did this because I know them, and had babysat for them as a teenager; one of the children I tended was the adoptive father.   We had a very respectful conversation for over an hour, I requested that they please discuss it with the adoptive couple and call me back in a week.  When we spoke the second time they had been instructed by their attorney, Larry Jenkins, to only go through their counsel and the courts when dealing with Jake.   I left all of our contact information and we hung up on very cordial terms.  

In fact my father, Jake’s grandfather, is still very good friends with adoptive grandparents and they see each other often.

In November 2011, I again was the one who wrote letters to the adoptive couple, grandparents, adoption agencies and attorneys.   This was not because Jake was not will or was not wanting to reach out.  I did it because I felt that as a mother, grandmother and concerned citizen it was my duty to do so.  Each of these letters are posted on the blog, in December 2011.  When we posted these letters Jake made sure that the names were redacted of all the adoptive family. 

This blog is set up for Jackson to be used as a journal and space to express emotions and spread Jack's story.  We hand out fliers everywhere we go, and have logos on our cars to get the word out about Jake and Jack’s story.  Again this is to help inform others of the abuse that is and has been happening in Utah adoptions as well as to help us deal with missing Jackson.

To imply that Jake has acted inappropriate towards the birth mother or the adoptive couple is just simply not true.  Jake has continued to fight in court for his right to parent his only child, he will continue to do so through the Utah Supreme Court.   We will also continue to work to change the laws in Utah to protect all parties in adoption, not just birth fathers.

Jake was with Whitney throughout her pregnancy, he did more than just financially support her.  They were together at family gatherings, Jack’s baby shower, Christmas events, and even at the lights the night before Jack was born.  Relationships are to be built on trust. Jake believed Whitney and even asked her around the middle of December if she was thinking of adoption – to which she responded “of course not, I can’t believe you would even ask me”.  Whitney’s only threat that Jake saw that was real at this time was that she would hold true to her word that if he did file on the paternity registry, if he did Whitney would receive notice, he would never see his son.  That is what Jake was told over and over by Whitney. That threat of not seeing his son was real if he filed. Jake watched how Whitney acted with Emery and her ex- husband.  Jake did not find out she was still married until the end of January 2011. Several others that know Whitney also believed that she was divorced.   Call it what you would like, fraud, deceit, manipulation but to ensure that Whitney was able to get what she wanted that is what she did. 

For a child who is in need of a loving home because their birth parent(s) cannot provide one for them for different reasons,then adoption is a blessing.  Most adoptive couples are trying to adopt because they cannot have their own biological children.  One way or another there has to be some type of loss for an adoptive child, sometimes it is for the adoptive parents as well.  Adoption has a lot of pain behind the veil of bliss that all would like to believe it is. 

To place a child into an adoptive situation when they have a loving father and family who has ALWAYS wanted, and can care for them is wrong.  Many adoptive children long for those who look like them, have their same genetic traits and talents.  It is not right to make the adoptive couple in fraudulent adoptions justify why they got to take the child home when their parents wanted them and did not place them for adoption.

Also, in fraudulent adoptions many things are left out such as medical information.  When both parents consent some agencies provide medical information, LDS family services is one agency that does.  But, because the social worker and Whitney did not want Jake involved, Jack has been denied his medical information.

Since we again know where Jack is, we have continued to reach out, we are willing to provide all information for Jack.  The adoptive couple’s attorney again has been the stumbling block.  But, all the adoptive couple has to do is to ask, even through their parents to Jake’s grandfather.  We have no other way to provide it.

Utah is a breeding ground for corruption because the laws have made fraudulent actions legal in adoption.  The truth is that these laws are only words on paper.  They will never change the fact that Jack is Jake’s son and part of our family.  Whether Jack comes home now, or is not able to connect with Jake until he is an adult we will be here for him.  Jack does not have to choose a family when he is an adult.  There is room for everyone, it is better to have more people in your life that love you.

We have NOT nor will we ever wish any ill will towards the adoptive couple.  We would never want Jack to be hurt or feel torn, but he has the right to the TRUTH and his FAMILY.

Dear adoptive parents of Jack, please love this little one with all of your heart.  Enjoy his every waking moment that he is in your care.  Take time to see the world through his baby blue eyes (I hope he got his daddy’s eyes).  Please don’t restrain his need for adventure, let him be curious and make mistakes to learn from.  If he takes after his daddy, you will love his outgoing funny personality, his true love for people, his wonderfully kind heart and trusting nature.   

Most of all treasure Jack as Jake does and love him enough to let him know his family. 

Sincerely, 

Jack's Grandma


12 comments:

  1. Well said. Very well said.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Why is Larry Jenkins the common denominator for all this hurt?!?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jake may not have said anything against certain people but you just did.........some people do it quietly as some voice it, how sad

    ReplyDelete
  4. It is a little creepy to try and go over the attorneys' heads and contact the adoptive family. It is probably not wise because of the ongoing court battle. When emotions run high, it would feel threatening to anyone in the adoptive parents' situations. I think that fathers do get the short end of the stick here in Utah. However, in my non-legal point of view, I think that the mother, who had to carry the child, get prenatal care, take care of herself, choose to keep the pregnancy, should have more say. I would be curious to know what the birth mother in this and possibly every case is to lie and deceive? I honestly feel sorry for all parties involved here. But I do wonder why these women are motivated to keep the birth fathers out. If somebody who knows would like to reply here I would really like to know.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm a stranger here and can't speak to the particulars of this case, but I've seen other blogs by potential adoptive parents in contested adoptions, where the potential adoptive parent argues that the father doesn't deserve access precisely because he never tried to reach out to them personally, to ask how the child was doing, etc. They tell the public its a sign the father wasn't interested. So even if his attempt to contact them made them feel uncomfortable, at least it means they can't argue he didn't try.

      I don't know what motivated this woman to keep the birth father out, but I know from conversations that some women would prefer their ex not be involved with their child at all, just because it is easier for them to not feel tied to someone they have so many strong emotions about. They can watch total strangers raise their children (and be told how wonderful they are for giving the child to these worthy parents or the wonderful parents to their otherwise-going-to-be-raised-by-a-single-parent-child) rather than have to cooperate in parenting jointly or accept the fact that someone they choose to break up with can be a good father. Young women are being told they should have more say because "they carry the baby" and so they decide to exclude men because they're told that's how it should be... their choice, their baby. They don't need a reason, as long as people keep telling them that carrying the child gives them more say.

      Anyway... the above is meant for the Anonymous person. To Jack's family, I say... I hold you in my prayers and I check your page regularily hoping to see good news.

      Delete
  5. I absolutely HATE these stories. I'm so sorry your son was taken from you in such a cruel way. I'll pray for you that you get him back as soon as possible. Be strong.

    As for the adoptive family--I just can NOT believe that anyone with a heart could ever deny someone the child that is rightfully, biologically, and legally theirs. It's so utterly selfish, to deny Jack his real father, only because THEY wanted a baby. They are willing to take someone else's knowing that that person wants their OWN CHILD? It's absolutely deplorable and sick. I'm so sorry this has happened to you.

    May this terrible, terrible wrong be righted as soon as possible. God bless!

    ReplyDelete
  6. While I understand there are few winners in child custody suits, and I do feel for your son, it seems he acted less than responsibly by not practicing birth control/safe sex. He showed a lack of respect for both himself and his partner. This is something all young men and women need to think about before they begin a sexual relationship.

    I'm sure the boy you consider your grandson now has loving and caring parents. I wish them the best.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What about the mother? She also acted less than responsibly and frankly, seems to be the common denominator for all the pain here.

      Delete
    2. "Shoalanda Speaks" sounds ignorant and uneducated. "She Should Shut-up". ;) Please people... if you're going to say anything about such an important subject make sure to not come across as a 6th grader--who has a tiny brain bubble from which your thoughts/words emerge like someone passing gas. They're stinky and cause us to scrunch our nose and give you a dirty look. Yuck. :( Excuse you!

      Delete
    3. Well, Janelle, I have four college degrees--not too ill-educated am I? Nor did I stoop to using fecal references. I'm looking at the situation from a totally unbiased point of view; are you?

      Delete
  7. As a three time adoptive parent myself, I am horrified that this baby was placed for adoption while the agency and the mother knew that the child's father wanted him.

    As soon as the adoptive family was notified of this, they should have not consented to the adoption. This is not going to work out for them well in the end, when the child grows up and learns the truth surrounding his adoption.

    Birthmothers and adoption agencies who place children against the wishes of the other biological parent need to be held criminally responsible.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hi ya, I’m a newebie to this blogging stuff But, I’ve just recently setup my own blog, and I really appreciate your site. I found it while searching for interesting articles on google. I’m going to add it to my favorites to check out future posts.
    Car Accident Lawyer
    Utah Car Accident Lawyer
    Car Accident
    car accident injury
    Lawyers in Utah

    ReplyDelete